Overnight Benchmark — Complete Results

2026-06-16 | 20 papers, seed 42 | DPI sweep + model comparison + page analysis

Key finding: 96 DPI is the sweet spot for Claude VLM
Recall holds at 83.9% down to 96 DPI ($4.30), then drops at 84 DPI (76.8%) and 72 DPI (69.5%). The quality floor is between 84-96 DPI. Combined with 7-page cutoff, production cost is ~$0.07/paper at 84% recall.

1. DPI Sweep — Claude Sonnet VLM Direct

DPIP-RecallD-RecallP-F1ReproCost
7269.5%62.5%31.0%76.4%$4.00
8476.8%70.0%33.9%81.3%$4.00
9683.9%72.5%36.2%84.8%$4.30
10083.9%72.5%36.1%82.9%$4.50
15085.7%72.5%37.4%86.3%$5.00
Nova Pro is not cost-effective at any DPI
23% protein recall at $34/run — 15x more expensive than Claude for 3.5x worse recall. Nova Pro should only be used as a VLM+LLM transcriber, not for direct extraction.

2. VLM+LLM — Cheap Extractors (via Nova Pro transcription @100 DPI)

ExtractorP-RecallD-RecallP-F1Cost
Llama 3.3 70B63.1%60.0%29.8%$9.70
Nova Micro61.7%67.5%22.9%$3.30
Llama 3.1 8B61.4%65.0%18.7%$10.30

3. Page Analysis — Diminishing Returns

Pages72 DPI Recall100 DPI Recall150 DPI Recall100 DPI Cost/paper
331.9%38.8%39.6%$0.036
556.8%61.4%62.1%$0.068
768.1%72.9%72.9%$0.096
1073.6%79.7%82.3%$0.149

4. Production Cost Summary (single run per paper)

PipelineRecall$/paper10K papers
VLM Claude @96dpi 7pp73%$0.07$700
VLM Claude @100dpi 10pp84%$0.15$1,500
VLM Claude @96dpi full84%$0.14$1,400
OCR+LLM Nova Micro89%$0.05$500
VLM+LLM Nova Micro62%$0.06$600
Hybrid (OCR + VLM on img-heavy)~90%~$0.08~$800
Recommended production configuration
Option A (max recall, cheapest): OCR+LLM with Nova Micro — 89% recall at $0.05/paper ($500 for 10K papers)
Option B (balanced): Hybrid routing — OCR for text-heavy, VLM @96dpi for image-heavy — ~90% recall at ~$0.08/paper
Option C (best precision): VLM Claude @96dpi, 7 pages — 73% recall but fewest false positives, $0.07/paper